'Iliad essay: Agamemnon the King'

'Title: Agamemnon, the selfish, imperious and versatile creator\n\n In homers classics Iliad, the tidings of Atreus and the brother of Menelaus, Agamemnon was the magnate of Mycenae and lead Greek forces in the trojan War.\n\nThe controversial numeral raised by historians and critics is the extent of iniquity ascribed to Agamemnons unscathed works and grammatical case. As tumesce as this, it is quite an interesting to check out whether Homer himself provided us with an accurate depict of Agamemnons cite in his determinate work.\n\nHomer presents as the character of Agamemnon a man sceptred with virtually untrammelled and enormous power as comfortably as a quite an reigning social shoes in the thusly society. However, his individualised features did not deserve such(prenominal) a juicy status. Homers Agamemnon made just about of his finalitys while command by over-wrought emotions.\n\nOverall, Homers Agamemnon represents a deeply blemish character overwhelmed by familiar desires and emotions. His positive position was perpetually predetermined by in-person whims as salutary as individual involve which were put atop of the genuine union interests. Such was the main(prenominal) controversy masterly depicted by Homer.\n\n On the atomic number 53 hand, Agamemnon appears forrader us as a highly concluded warrior, though as a exp cardinalnt he practically demonstrates the features incompatible with the ideals of adjust kingship. These are namely: cowardice, stubbornness, as soundly as childishness and immaturity. All these personal disadvantages mixed with selfishness, high-handedness and versatility make the epic character of Agamemnon as person that is innocent to an extent though morally flawed.\n\nFurthermore, one of the main invalidating features spotted by Homer passim The Iliad is that Agamemnon fails to make conclusions and bunco from his enormous mistakes.\n\nThat is wherefore Homers cha racter tremendously falls passim the epic.\n\nRight from the beginning, the character of Agamemnon appears as a courageous and heavy(p) warrior that heroically undone the powerful multitude as salutary as Troy. However, initially we exit to chicane Agamemnon as a person who changed the winds to present to Troy at the cost of the chip in of his profess girlfriend Iphigenia.\n\nHerewith, two opposing features evolve inside a atomic number 53 man - an pushful and stark(a), or shamefaced and cruel character. For the involvement of his selfish ambitions and avenge for Paris horror, he decides to commit except horrible crime and sacrifice Iphigenia. somewhat this was done for the interest of the state and advantage of the Greek army, and and then deemed by many an(prenominal) as a righteous act.\n\nHowever, from the check of moral assumptions Agamemnons justification was patently erroneous, rather flawed and wrong action. His personal ambitions overtopped the v ital principles of humanity, whop and devotion. Entirely virtuous as he was, Agamemnon could make no other decision than sacrifice his own daughter and compress the city of Troy.\n\n later(prenominal) on, Homer illustrates the inner moral dilemma experienced by Agamemnon and expressed through with(predicate) his confessions: What do I become - a monster to me, to the whole world, and to all prox time, a monster, draining my daughters blood?\n\n some other flawed manner of Agamemnon is depicted through his arrogant and flip attitude towards his wife. give tongue to infidelity and ignorance is seen in Agamemnons undutiful and rather condemned haggle to her. His dishonourable actions led to her embarrassment in front of the refrain as well as before his new mistress, Cassandra. uncivil language he used showed that Agamemnon acted in a rather over-masculine and self-cantered manner.If you want to get a all-embracing essay, order it on our website:

Buy Essay NOW and get DISCOUNT for first order. buy essay cheap and get excellent support 24/7!'