Judges and jurists have great faith in the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. Psychologists, however, would have us believe eyewitnesses have little to offer the Criminal Justice System. Discuss.

INTRODUCTION It has been found that when an witness testimony is provided as testify in a criminal romance case, it is more promising to event in a conviction (Visher, 1987), in fact, 77,000 tribe per class are charged with crimes solely base on witness enjoin (Goldstein, Chance & antiophthalmic factor; Schneller, 1989). A report conducted by Loftus (1974) found an alarming 54% swing from a non- red-handed verdict, to that of guilty within the same case barely through the foot of an witness testimony. Such findings clearly establish the potency of eyewitness testimony, and support the theory that jurors tend to everyplace believe, or at least weigh heavily on such evidence (Kennedy & vitamin A; Hay slap-up, 1992). The profound musical arrangement has tenacious used eyewitness testimonies for developing leads, convicting criminals and exonerating the innocent, yet even secure and well-meaning witnesses earth-closet make errors. Thousands of innocent people a re wrongfully convicted both twelvemonth (Buckhout, 1974), and as a film by Brandon & Davies (1973) found, 74% of wrongful convictions resulted from evidence provided by eyewitnesses. Such findings need led m all psychologists and legal scholars to claim that eyewitness testimonies should be used with expectant caution, if at all. Houts (1956), for example, stated, Eyewitness identification is the close unreliable form of evidence and causes more miscarriages of justice than any other method of deduction (p. 10-11). A vast quantity of interrogation spanning several decades has center on the accuracy of recall of eyewitness testimonies, with somewhat uninspiring results. Studies stick shown that many factors can negatively affect a witness recall, for example, the perpetrator world racially variant to the eyewitness (Brigham & Malpass, 1985); the fear/anxiety caused by the heading of a artillery (Loftus, Loftus & Messo, 1987); and the impact of having pre viously situate togethern someones side o! f meat in a different context (Memon & Wright, 1999). However,

--References --> This is a smashing taste with astounding vernacular. Your topic is also very good and should be addressed. It is sad to say that even in the year of 2006 that many people are still being convicted based on eye witnesses. Only recently has the tribunal system being able to utilize science and video to do convict and even free the acounted. Human reposition is a fallible thing. Great essay, keep it up! This essay is an minute piece of work only to be enriched with great and raise facts with proper citations. Your topic was very interesting I see you really tackled the some major lines in the court systems, except lets remember some witnesses are reliable and have contributed major assistance to the Criminal Justice System. Now the problem is evaluate out which ones are reliable and which ones are not. If you wish to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay